您现在的位置是:焦點 >>正文
【】
焦點362人已围观
简介The imminent WeChat ban that was set to remove the app from U.S. app stores on Sunday is going to ha ...
The imminent WeChat ban that was set to remove the app from U.S. app stores on Sunday is going to have to wait a bit longer. It's a big positive step for an app that has more than a billion users worldwide.
In a Sunday ruling, a U.S. judge in California put the brakes on Donald Trump's executive order from August calling for a WeChat ban (h/t CNBC). The court decision grew out of a lawsuit filed by the U.S. WeChat Users Alliance, following a Friday hearing.
"This is nothing else than a ban," Alliance attorney Michael Bien said in court on Friday, according to the Wall Street Journal. "What matters is our clients' rights to use the app will end on Sunday," he added, referring the the Sept. 20 date for the ban as laid out in Trump's order.
The executive actions were motivated by what Trump described as a national security risk, with Chinese companies – specifically WeChat and TikTok, in this case – potentially having access to American citizens' user data. The order called for control of the data to be handed over to U.S. interests, and that seems to be happening in the case of TikTok.
In the California WeChat case, the federal government maintained that a WeChat ban didn't represent an infringement on the plaintiffs' constitutional rights because there are other apps that provide similar features. But Judge Laurel Beeler, who is presiding over the case, wasn't sold.
SEE ALSO:Trump officially signs an executive order to ban TikTok and WeChat"[T]he court grants the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction on the ground that the plaintiffs have shown serious questions going to the merits of the First Amendment claim, the balance of hardships tips in the plaintiffs' favor, and the plaintiffs establish sufficiently the other elements for preliminary-injunctive relief," the court order reads.
The injunction also blocks a U.S. Commerce Department order that would have prevented U.S. interests from doing business with WeChat. Such a move could have undermined the platform's performance and functioned as a sort of de facto ban.
Neither Trump nor the Commerce Department had commented on Beeler's decision at the time of this writing. But this is a preliminary injunction meant to avoid unnecessary disruptions while the lawsuit unfolds, so the legal struggle is far from over.
TopicsSocial MediaDonald TrumpPolitics
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://new.maomao321.com/news/1b51299486.html
相关文章
Tributes flow after death of former Singapore president S.R. Nathan
焦點The Singaporean government has announced that former president, 92-year-old Sellapan Ramanathan (wid ...
【焦點】
阅读更多Marvel's 'Hawkeye' is a superfluous joy ride
焦點2021 may have been the year of nonstop Marvel, but that abundance somehow hasn’t hit the point ...
【焦點】
阅读更多How accurate is Fitbit's calorie counting?
焦點Most fitness trackers keep a fair number of the same stats: things like steps taken, distance travel ...
【焦點】
阅读更多
热门文章
- Nancy Pelosi warns colleagues after info hacked
- Painful sex due to big penises has a deep history. Penis
- XGIMI projectors on Amazon
- 'Blade Runner' live action TV series is coming, Ridley Scott confirms
- Dressage horse dancing to 'Smooth' by Santana wins gold for chillest horse
- 'Sex and the City' character dies on Peloton bike, and the company isn't having it
最新文章
Fake news reports from the Newseum are infinitely better than actual news
Marvel's 'Hawkeye' is a superfluous joy ride
Snapchat launches 'Layers' in Snap Map
How accurate is Fitbit's calorie counting?
Darth Vader is back. Why do we still care?
South Korea will use VR to assess whether elderly drivers can get a license