您现在的位置是:時尚 >>正文
【】
時尚542人已围观
简介Following a much buzzed-about trailer, Alex Garland's political action thriller Civil Warhad its wor ...
Following a much buzzed-about trailer, Alex Garland's political action thriller Civil Warhad its world premiere at SXSW last Thursday, garnering a slew of rave reviews. The reaction online since then — both to the movie itself and reviews out of the film festival — have been divisive, which might have been Garland's purpose.
Set during a second American Civil War in a not-so-distant future, the film follows four journalists (Kirsten Dunst, Wagner Moura, Priscilla's Cailee Spaeny, and Stephen McKinley Henderson) on a road trip through the war-torn U.S. on a quest to interview the president (Nick Offerman) before secessionist forces invade Washington, D.C.
SEE ALSO:'Civil War' review: Alex Garland's latest is more 'Men,' less 'Ex Machina'The A24 film doesn't open in theaters until April 12. But that hasn't stopped social media users from conversing about the film from the title alone.
With reviews out of SXSW confirming that the movie is about the power of journalism rather than politics, some on social are going to war over it.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Maybe "going to war" is a bit hyperbolic. But having seen Civil Warmyself at its SXSW premiere, it's strange to see such opinionated takes ahead of its wide release. These divisive reactions might support Garland's point about the dangers of an "us versus them" mentality, whatever the politics. (Though personally, I found the film's apolitical approach unconvincing.)
To begin with, there was a lot of confusion about why California and Texas would team up in a civil war together.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Others state that because the film's focus is on war journalism, any debate about the movie's politics is deliberately missing the point. Or they suggest that negative reactions to the movie's apolitical approach have drawn ire because Garland didn't validate the political stance of the viewers as they thought he should.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
However, some felt it was weird to release this film during an election year and not have anything to say but "both sides bad."
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Garland knows his film will be divisive; he admitted as much in his interview with The Hollywood Reportersaying that the film is intentionally "trying to create a conversation about political divisiveness" that "vilifies the other side." Whether or not that decision to stir the pot will be good for the film's box office remains to be seen. You'll just have to wait to see Civil War yourself.
Civil War hits theaters on April 12.
TopicsFilmSocial MediaPolitics
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://new.maomao321.com/news/42e20499753.html
相关文章
Tesla's rumored P100D could make Ludicrous mode even more Ludicrous
時尚A Tesla Model S P100D begs the question: What's more Ludicrous than Ludicrous?Right now, the biggest ...
【時尚】
阅读更多朗尼克鎖定曼聯引援首選 紫百合鋒霸符合戰術體係
時尚朗尼克鎖定曼聯引援首選 紫百合鋒霸符合戰術體係_弗拉霍維奇_歐元_莫斯科火車頭www.ty42.com 日期:2021-11-27 10:01:00| 評論(已有316109條評論) ...
【時尚】
阅读更多海港外援中衛邁斯老傷複發 大概率錯過本賽季剩餘聯賽
時尚海港外援中衛邁斯老傷複發 大概率錯過本賽季剩餘聯賽_訓練_進行_康複期www.ty42.com 日期:2021-11-26 07:31:00| 評論(已有315917條評論) ...
【時尚】
阅读更多