您现在的位置是:探索 >>正文
【】
探索1436人已围观
简介It's been a long time coming, but LGBTQ workers are finallya step closer to being truly protected fr ...
It's been a long time coming, but LGBTQ workers are finallya step closer to being truly protected from workplace discrimination, according to a ruling from a federal appeals court in Chicago. The judges determined that, under the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act, LGBT employees cannot be fired on the basis of their sexual orientation, the first time that determination has been made in court.
SEE ALSO:LGBTQ people to Trump: We're here, we're queer, and you won't erase usIt stems from the case of Kimberly Hively, who sued Ivy Tech Community College in South Bend, Indiana, alleging that the school denied her promotions and eventually fired her because she's a lesbian. A federal appeals court panel upheld the dismissal of her lawsuit last year; this ruling reversed that.
Hively sounded relieved by the new ruling in a statement issued by Lamba Legal: “I have been saying all this time that what happened to me wasn’t right and was illegal," she said. "Now I will have my day in court, thanks to this decision. No one should be fired for being lesbian, gay, or transgender like happened to me and it’s incredibly powerful to know that the law now protects me and other LGBT workers.”
Tweet may have been deleted
The 8-3 decision in favor of protecting LGBTQ rights was a bit of a surprise to experts as five of the judges on the panel were appointed by Republican presidents, leaving many to view the court as traditionally conservative and less likely to rule in favor of LGBTQ workers.
But several of those judges came down on the side of LGBTQ protection, including Judge Richard Posner, who was appointed by Ronald Reagan. In his opinion defending LGBTQ workers, Posner explained, "I don't see why firing a lesbian because she is in the subset of women who are lesbian should be thought any less a form of sex discrimination than firing a woman because she's a woman."
"No one should be fired for being lesbian, gay, or transgender"
Much of the panel's debate centered around the definition of the word "sex," as included in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and whether that included sexual orientation.
In her opinion for the majority, Judge Diane Wood wrote, "Any discomfort, disapproval, or job decision based on the fact that the complainant—woman or man—dresses differently, speaks differently, or dates or marries a same-sex partner, is a reaction purely and simply based on sex. That means that it falls within Title VII's prohibition against sex discrimination."
Judge Diane Sykes, a conservative, wrote in her dissent, "We are not authorized to infuse the text with a new or unconventional meaning or to update it to respond to changed social, economic, or political conditions."
Tweet may have been deleted
So what's next? This new ruling means the case will probably make its way to the Supreme Court, because it's unlikely the Republican-led Congress will update the Act to reflect the ruling.
And there's plenty of fight left to go. As of now, 18 states still hold absolutely no protection from workplace discrimination for LGBTQ employees; other protections vary from state to state. And most states still lack protection against workplace discrimination based on gender identity.
The map below, via the Human Rights Campaign, outlines exactly what states have which protections.
In a statement, HRC Legal Director Sarah Warbelow said, “Today’s ruling is a monumental victory for fairness in the workplace, and for the dignity of lesbian, gay and bisexual Americans who may live in fear of losing their job based on whom they love."
Additional reporting by the Associated Press
Featured Video For You
Airbnb wants you to wear this ring until LGBTQ people can get married
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://new.maomao321.com/news/4e38799608.html
相关文章
Let an 1865 dating ad give you tips on how to woo like a Victorian lover
探索Are we certain that men have actually evolved in the last century or so? Sure it may seem like there ...
【探索】
阅读更多Hallmark drops Lori Loughlin after college admissions scandal
探索Former Hallmark movie darling Lori Loughlin has been dropped by the network in the wake of the colle ...
【探索】
阅读更多Huawei caught using stock images to promote smartphone's camera
探索New marketing for Huawei's upcoming P30 smartphone has been caught trying to pass stock images as ph ...
【探索】
阅读更多
热门文章
- iPhones of the future may memorize your sleep patterns
- We regret to inform you that this brand tweet about St. Louis food is funny
- AOC obliterates claim that fighting climate change is 'elitist' in stirring speech
- Wow, budget airline WOW Air is just done
- Journalists try to figure out the mysterious case of a Trump portrait
- Robert Downey Jr. sparks 'Avengers' battle over who has the best 'stache
最新文章
Tim Cook says Apple is working on self
Why is Fox News so quiet about Jeanine Pirro's anti
Google's Stadia turns Chrome into your video game console
Why is Fox News so quiet about Jeanine Pirro's anti
Martha Stewart's surprising thoughts on 'Millennial Pink'
NASA photos capture historic flooding of critical U.S. Air Force base