您现在的位置是:休閑 >>正文
【】
休閑89人已围观
简介Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round ...
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://new.maomao321.com/news/55c7599869.html
相关文章
Pole vaulter claims his penis is not to blame
休閑Following the cringeworthy moment in which pole vaulter Hiroki Ogita's penis grazed the bar and he f ...
【休閑】
阅读更多GoPro's drone delayed until the holidays
休閑Waiting for GoPro's top-secret drone? Well, you'll have to wait some more.GoPro announced in its Q1 ...
【休閑】
阅读更多Coworkers Photoshopped a sleeping intern into an affectionate meme
休閑Never fall asleep at work, especially if you work at the ad agency iris Worldwide.Unfortunately for ...
【休閑】
阅读更多
热门文章
- Is Samsung's Galaxy Note7 really the best phone?
- Fort McMurray wildfire has burned area larger than entire city of Chicago
- GoPro's drone delayed until the holidays
- 'Hamilton' scalpers pocket $240,000 every week. Here's how they get away with it.
- Airbnb activates disaster response site for Louisiana flooding
- Is the iPhone 7 going to have a damn headphone jack or not?
最新文章
Dog elected for third term as mayor of Minnesota town
Reddit has just about proven Godwin's Law
Fort McMurray wildfire has burned area larger than entire city of Chicago
Photos and videos show devastation of Canadian wildfires
'The Flying Bum' aircraft crashes during second test flight
Radiohead shares 'Daydreaming' video from new album coming Sunday