您现在的位置是:休閑 >>正文
【】
休閑3人已围观
简介Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round ...
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://new.maomao321.com/news/55c7599869.html
相关文章
You will love/hate Cards Against Humanity's new fortune cookies
休閑If you've ever ordered Cards Against Humanity from the delightfully corrupt board game's website, yo ...
【休閑】
阅读更多Chance the Rapper just gave 300 pairs of unreleased Jordans to high schoolers
休閑Can Chance the Rapper do something mean, please?Chicago's philanthropic rapper brought an early Chri ...
【休閑】
阅读更多Witness this woman's rollercoaster ride of emotions as she wins $11 on HQ Trivia
休閑The fool who said it's not about winning, it's the taking part that counts was horribly, horribly mi ...
【休閑】
阅读更多
热门文章
- J.K. Rowling makes 'Harry Potter' joke about Olympics event
- How to use your Bitmoji on Facebook, Snapchat, Google Chrome, and more
- Facebook doesn't scan Messenger for fake news. But it definitely should
- Kelly Marie Tran hugs friend John Boyega's costume and it's too cute
- Visualizing July's astounding global temperature records
- This student's story about her first college exam is so hilariously cringy
最新文章
One of the most controversial power struggles in media comes to a close
Record cold in the U.S. and Canada won't yield anytime soon
Female senators set example for GOP as they ask Al Franken to resign
Apple says it broke another big App Store record on New Year's Day
Snapchat is about to explode in popularity, report says
The time has come for Mark Zuckerberg to reveal his 2018 personal challenge