您现在的位置是:休閑 >>正文
【】
休閑339人已围观
简介Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round ...
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://new.maomao321.com/news/55c7599869.html
相关文章
Uber's $100M settlement over drivers as contractors may not be enough
休閑UPDATE: Sept. 7, 2016, 4:41 p.m. EDT 。 A ruling in a different case on Wednesday, Sept. 7 may have ch ...
【休閑】
阅读更多Twitter will cut 350 employees as part of its path to profitability
休閑Twitter is set on turning a profit next year. 。 As part its strategy to reach profitability in 2017, ...
【休閑】
阅读更多Newt Gingrich to Megyn Kelly on Fox News: 'You are fascinated with sex'
休閑Megyn Kelly and Newt Gingrich locked horns Tuesday night in a Fox News segment that ended with an ar ...
【休閑】
阅读更多
热门文章
- The U.S. will no longer have the final say on internet domain names
- Women will direct every single episode of 'Jessica Jones' Season 2
- A sloth Photoshop battle is the only thing better than a sloth
- 'Gilmore Girls' costumer reveals unbreakable set dress code
- Richard Branson 'thought he was going to die' in bike accident
- India will have a billion mobile phone users by 2020: GSMA
最新文章
Honda's all
iPhone 8 might come in three different sizes
A sloth Photoshop battle is the only thing better than a sloth
Newt Gingrich to Megyn Kelly on Fox News: 'You are fascinated with sex'
Two astronauts just installed a new parking spot on the International Space Station
New York Times prints terrifying list of all of Donald Trump's Twitter insults