您现在的位置是:休閑 >>正文
【】TopicsFacebookSocial Media
休閑1人已围观
简介Warning: This post contains a graphic image that some readers may find disturbing.。If you have an ic ...
Warning: This post contains a graphic image that some readers may find disturbing.。
If you have an iconic image on your hands, forget the front page: You're posting it on Facebook.。
That's exactly what the Associated Press did Monday, shortly after the assassination of Andrey G. Karlov, the Russian ambassador to Turkey. A young man shot the official to death at an art exhibit in Ankara, and the AP's Burhan Ozbilici captured the entire violent incident.。
Less than two hours after the news broke, the AP's official account for images on Facebook shared a photograph of the gunman, arm raised in triumph, standing over Karlov's body.。

It spread rapidly, proving for the umpteenth time Facebook's incredible influence over how we receive information. That one AP post reached nine million people just six hours after it was published, according to internal metrics shared with 。 Mashable 。Mashable 。
. 。
The photo, as of the publishing of this article, had been shared over 45,000 times, with 5,600 comments and 28,000 "reactions" — which refer to various uses of the Like button.。 Lauren Easton, AP's director of media relations, told。Lauren Easton, AP's director of media relations, told。
Mashable Light SpeedWant more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories?Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. 。 By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。 Thanks for signing up!。

Mashable 。
that the photo post had 175 times the average engagement for the AP Images page. The company provided a graph showing how quickly the photo accumulated interactions — Likes, shares, comments and clicks on Facebook. You can see that it didn't take long to snowball:。 Credit: NewsWhip 。By every measure, the photograph is a huge viral moment for the news outlet. Thousands upon thousands of people shared it with their friends in a few short hours, even though it clearly shows the body of a man who had been shot to death by a terrorist. A gut-turning act of violence, one we wish we'd never seen, became yet another bit of shareable content, wedged between status updates and other social ephemera. 。
"With those shares, the photo is surfacing on the News Feed of friends of whomever shared the post," Gabriele Boland, an analyst at NewsWhip, told。



Mashable。
. "Because of Facebook's algorithm that favors content shared by users over publishers and brands, more people are likely to see the photo in their News Feed. Then, they too may share it out, and the cycle continues."。
You're probably familiar with how those shares look — and the sometimes rancid flavor added by the individual posting the content:。That, for better or worse, is the media today: a startling photograph or article tossed onto your Facebook News Feed, perhaps by a doofus joking about a coldblooded murder.。
None of this is new, of course, but let's consider the context. Facebook has faced intense scrutiny in recent months for its role in distributing misinformation, hoaxes and other so-called "fake news." Despite its obvious role in distributing news, the company has consistently refused to acknowledge its responsibility as a media company, though last week it announced partnerships with third-party fact-checkers to battle the spread of "disputed" information on its platform. 。 SEE ALSO:Facebook failed America this year — now it should kill the News Feed 。Reasonably enough, the conversations surrounding Facebook's responsibilities tend to focus on what's going wrong. "Fake news" is spreading. The company inadvertently censored an iconic photograph. Its algorithms create "echo chambers" where users comfortably shout their opinions to those who agree with them. 。
One could argue about whether the photograph -- which is violent, disturbing and perhaps even glorifying -- should have been published at all, at least without a warning. (The。 New York Times。published an interview justifying its use of the image, saying, "The picture very clearly shows the shocking nature of the attack -- much more powerfully ... than a mere description.") Facebook let it stand, and then the site did its thing, spreading information across an intricate network of connected "friends" scrolling through their News Feeds.。
It's something of an apples to oranges comparison, but food for thought: Nine million people is considerably more than the print circulations of the Wall Street Journal and。
New York Times 。
New York Times 。
, combined. 。
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://new.maomao321.com/news/84f799908.html
相关文章
Olympian celebrates by ordering an intimidating amount of McDonald's
休閑It's no secret that Olympians have to eat clean for years to ensure they're at peak physical conditi ...
【休閑】
阅读更多Even Senator Al Franken is worried about iPhone X's Face ID
休閑The iPhone X is finally here, and with it comes a host of new features that Apple promises herald th ...
【休閑】
阅读更多Denny's craptastic new mascot has inspired some pretty good poop jokes
休閑Denny’s is best known for their signature Grand Slam breakfasts, but that may have just change ...
【休閑】
阅读更多
热门文章
- Watch MTV's Video Music Awards 2016 livestream
- So how worried should we be about Apple's Face ID?
- The Miami Airport is showing us how to use Twitter during a disaster
- The new Apple Watch Series 3 is trying to look out for your heart
- Dressage horse dancing to 'Smooth' by Santana wins gold for chillest horse
- Hillary Clinton may have found the one person more annoying than Ted Cruz
最新文章
Snapchat is about to explode in popularity, report says
What the iPhone X means for the iPhone 11
Kickstarter addict reflects on backing $16,000 worth of board games, regrets everything
'Darkest Hour' review: Gary Oldman shines in WWII drama
Two states took big steps this week to get rid of the tampon tax
Trump's millionaire treasury secretary asked to use a military jet for his honeymoon