您现在的位置是:焦點 >>正文
【】as a source only in limited situations.
焦點8人已围观
简介Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。Editors for the site (who are all volunteer ...
Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia. 。
Editors for the site (who are all volunteers) voted Wednesday to almost entirely ban the British tabloid newspaper the 。Daily Mail 。as a source, calling the publication "generally unreliable." 。
SEE ALSO:Early newspaper editions could not keep up with that legendary Super Bowl ending 。The 。 Daily Mail。's reliability has been a point of contention on the user-edited encyclopedia site since 2015 if not earlier. But discussion about its efficacy as a source was revived in early January when one user led the campaign against the。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail。
.。

Editor Hillbillyholiday argued during a discussion that the outlet is untrustworthy for science-related stories, inappropriately posts photos of children and has limited credibility even with direct quotes and interviews. 。 Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the。Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the 。
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. 。 By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. 。Thanks for signing up! 。

Daily Mail。
, as hated as it is, is a very mixed bag. It can contain wonderful information such as accurate and informative interviews with highly respected people."。 The Daily Mail was dragged through the mud on a Wikipedia discussion about its reliability.Credit: Steve Meddle/REX/Shutterstock。 Ultimately, though, the news outlet has been effectively banned as a source, due to its "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication."。
The Wikimedia Foundation, who runs the main Wiki site, pointed out that the outlet isn't fully banned -- its use as a reference is just "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.” But the key takeaway is that the。 Daily Mail 。Daily Mail。
is no longer a go-to reliable source for citing something on a page.。 The ruling does not mean the。Mail 。 can never be used as a source, but editors are being encouraged to change information that cites the publication to a different source. 。 The 。 Mail 。joins the。 National Enquirer 。among the few outlets that Wikipedia has called out in particular.。
The Sun。
and the 。
Daily Mirror。
are also seen as unreliable. Wikipedia also warns against using state-run media like China's Xinhua or Iran's Press TV as sources.。Additional reporting by Jason Abbruzzese. 。Featured Video For You 。Even Fox News is defending CNN against Trump。
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://new.maomao321.com/news/95a5499850.html
相关文章
Whyd voice
焦點Amazon's Echo made controlling music with your voice easy-peasy, but its sound quality could be a lo ...
【焦點】
阅读更多最“瘋狂”的中超 :比賽質量或無下限 走到今天痛心疾首
焦點最“瘋狂”的中超 :比賽質量或無下限 走到今天痛心疾首_球員www.ty42.com 日期:2021-07-12 10:31:00| 評論(已有290965條評論) ...
【焦點】
阅读更多索斯蓋特 :失敗的痛苦是巨大的 但三獅該為自己自豪
焦點索斯蓋特:失敗的痛苦是巨大的 但三獅該為自己自豪_世界杯www.ty42.com 日期:2021-07-12 10:01:00| 評論(已有290958條評論) ...
【焦點】
阅读更多