您现在的位置是:焦點 >>正文
【】as a source only in limited situations.
焦點8636人已围观
简介Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。Editors for the site (who are all volunteer ...
Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia. 。
Editors for the site (who are all volunteers) voted Wednesday to almost entirely ban the British tabloid newspaper the 。Daily Mail 。as a source, calling the publication "generally unreliable."。
SEE ALSO:Early newspaper editions could not keep up with that legendary Super Bowl ending。The 。 Daily Mail 。's reliability has been a point of contention on the user-edited encyclopedia site since 2015 if not earlier. But discussion about its efficacy as a source was revived in early January when one user led the campaign against the。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail。
.。

Editor Hillbillyholiday argued during a discussion that the outlet is untrustworthy for science-related stories, inappropriately posts photos of children and has limited credibility even with direct quotes and interviews.。 Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the。Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the。
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. 。 By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。Thanks for signing up!。
One user commented with a "strong oppose" comment that "The。Daily Mail 。
, as hated as it is, is a very mixed bag. It can contain wonderful information such as accurate and informative interviews with highly respected people."。 The Daily Mail was dragged through the mud on a Wikipedia discussion about its reliability.Credit: Steve Meddle/REX/Shutterstock。 Ultimately, though, the news outlet has been effectively banned as a source, due to its "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication."。
The Wikimedia Foundation, who runs the main Wiki site, pointed out that the outlet isn't fully banned -- its use as a reference is just "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.” But the key takeaway is that the。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail。
is no longer a go-to reliable source for citing something on a page. 。 The ruling does not mean the 。Mail。 can never be used as a source, but editors are being encouraged to change information that cites the publication to a different source.。 The。 Mail。joins the。 National Enquirer。among the few outlets that Wikipedia has called out in particular.。
The Sun。
and the 。
Daily Mirror 。
are also seen as unreliable. Wikipedia also warns against using state-run media like China's Xinhua or Iran's Press TV as sources.。Additional reporting by Jason Abbruzzese. 。Featured Video For You 。Even Fox News is defending CNN against Trump 。
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://new.maomao321.com/news/95a5499850.html
相关文章
Honda's all
焦點When Honda revealed its stunning and grandparent-scaring Civic Hatchback Prototype earlier this year ...
【焦點】
阅读更多區楚良:郭田雨具備國足中鋒特性 針對不同對手使用歸化
焦點區楚良:郭田雨具備國足中鋒特性 針對不同對手使用歸化_比賽www.ty42.com 日期:2021-04-25 08:31:00| 評論(已有272072條評論) ...
【焦點】
阅读更多西多夫:回歸紅黑軍團開啟教練生涯 曾經來華執教深圳隊
焦點西多夫:回歸紅黑軍團開啟教練生涯 曾經來華執教深圳隊_米蘭www.ty42.com 日期:2021-04-25 08:31:00| 評論(已有272092條評論) ...
【焦點】
阅读更多
