您现在的位置是:焦點 >>正文
【】as a source only in limited situations.
焦點139人已围观
简介Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。Editors for the site (who are all volunteer ...
Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia. 。
Editors for the site (who are all volunteers) voted Wednesday to almost entirely ban the British tabloid newspaper the 。Daily Mail。as a source, calling the publication "generally unreliable." 。
SEE ALSO:Early newspaper editions could not keep up with that legendary Super Bowl ending 。The 。 Daily Mail 。's reliability has been a point of contention on the user-edited encyclopedia site since 2015 if not earlier. But discussion about its efficacy as a source was revived in early January when one user led the campaign against the。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail 。
.。

Editor Hillbillyholiday argued during a discussion that the outlet is untrustworthy for science-related stories, inappropriately posts photos of children and has limited credibility even with direct quotes and interviews.。 Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the 。Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the 。
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。 By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。Thanks for signing up!。

Daily Mail。
, as hated as it is, is a very mixed bag. It can contain wonderful information such as accurate and informative interviews with highly respected people." 。 The Daily Mail was dragged through the mud on a Wikipedia discussion about its reliability.Credit: Steve Meddle/REX/Shutterstock。 Ultimately, though, the news outlet has been effectively banned as a source, due to its "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication."。
The Wikimedia Foundation, who runs the main Wiki site, pointed out that the outlet isn't fully banned -- its use as a reference is just "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.” But the key takeaway is that the。 Daily Mail。Daily Mail。
is no longer a go-to reliable source for citing something on a page.。 The ruling does not mean the 。Mail 。 can never be used as a source, but editors are being encouraged to change information that cites the publication to a different source. 。 The 。 Mail。joins the。 National Enquirer。among the few outlets that Wikipedia has called out in particular. 。
The Sun。
and the。
Daily Mirror。
are also seen as unreliable. Wikipedia also warns against using state-run media like China's Xinhua or Iran's Press TV as sources.。Additional reporting by Jason Abbruzzese.。Featured Video For You 。Even Fox News is defending CNN against Trump。
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://new.maomao321.com/news/95a5499850.html
相关文章
Plane makes emergency landing after engine rips apart during flight
焦點A Southwest Airlines flight bound for Orlando, Florida, made an emergency landing Saturday morning d ...
【焦點】
阅读更多國足封閉期間不接受媒體采訪 冷處理李鐵炮轟成最佳解決方案
焦點國足封閉期間不接受媒體采訪 冷處理李鐵炮轟成最佳解決方案_中國隊www.ty42.com 日期:2021-11-21 15:31:00| 評論(已有315031條評論) ...
【焦點】
阅读更多國安亞冠最後9人歸來開始隔離 12月中旬有望和家人團聚
焦點國安亞冠最後9人歸來開始隔離 12月中旬有望和家人團聚_球員www.ty42.com 日期:2021-11-23 12:01:00| 評論(已有315337條評論) ...
【焦點】
阅读更多