您现在的位置是:探索 >>正文
【】
探索235人已围观
简介Alexa Answers is somehow turning out even worse than expected. The program, launched in September, g ...
Alexa Answers is somehow turning out even worse than expected.
The program, launched in September, gives any idiot off the streets of the U.S. the chance to answer real questions posed to Amazon's Alexa smart assistant by actual people. As any thinking internet user might have expected, just over a month into the service those answers range from unintentionally inaccurate, to deliberate trolling, to calculated misinformation.
According to Amazon, here's how Alexa Answers is supposed to work: "Discover questions Alexa doesn't have an answer for, submit your own and share them with the world."
And by share them, Amazon means you'll have your answer actually read aloud to real people by their smart assistant.
In exchange for this decidedly unpaid labor, contributors are rewarded with "points." It's perhaps unsurprising, then, that the old aphorism "you get what you pay for" applies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fec4/8fec44c2c1ffd9b014a8d787d768a7e607c55bc2" alt="Mashable Image"
Take one question and answer combo, viewable at the time of this writing on the Alexa Answers "community answers" page.
"What are mold pigs," reads the question posed by some Alexa user, somewhere. The correct answer, at least according to an Oct. 9 CNN story, is "a new family, genus and species of microinvertebrates that lived during the mid-Tertiary period."
The Alexa Answers answer, "currently being shared with Alexa customers," reads quite differently.
"Mold pigs are overweight animals, usually with green or purple hair and an unpleasant demeanor. Their usual habitat is west-coast university campuses."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52650/52650c7d172c9103ffca5230c1c767d168a1794b" alt="Mashable Image"
This, obviously, is someone trolling Alexa users. All in all, it's relatively harmless — even if it is wrong. However, according to a deep dive by VentureBeat, this is just the tip of the rapidly melting iceberg.
One example surfaced by the publication especially stands out. The question, "why are cows bad for the environment," was put to Alexa Answers users. While there are numerous, nuanced ways to answer this question, Alexa Answers takes a different approach.
"Cows are no more harmful for the environment than any other animal," reads one Alexa Answers response. "The 'cow farts' theory is a made-up theory by climate change radicals."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f93b/5f93be7c4f2dac9151c6bb6627a56a5201773033" alt="Mashable Image"
In case you're actually curious, the World Resources Institute has a detailed explanation of how beef production and consumption contributes to climate change. It does not involve the phrase "made-up theory."
SEE ALSO:Now any idiot off the street can answer your dumb Alexa questionsVentureBeat also discovered at least one instance of what appears to be product placement masquerading as a helpful answer. Likely, that is not an isolated instance.
That a for-profit corporation's attempt to crowdsource free labor backfired shouldn't come as a surprise to any thinking person. Why Amazon thought any of this would work out well, on the other hand, is a different question — one that even a trolling Alexa Answers user could have likely answered with a hearty "no way in hell."
TopicsAlexaAmazon
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://new.maomao321.com/news/54d52799418.html
相关文章
More than half of women in advertising have faced sexual harassment, report says
探索If you are a woman in advertising, chances are you've faced workplace sexual harassment at one point ...
【探索】
阅读更多【波盈足球】 阿根廷世足賽奪冠 球評:法國兩度扳平不容易 ( 法國,阿根廷 )
探索【波盈足球】 阿根廷世足賽奪冠 球評:法國兩度扳平不容易 ( 法國,阿根廷 )www.ty42.com 日期:2022-12-19 00:00:00| 評論(已有355965條評論) ...
【探索】
阅读更多豬頭肉涼拌怎麽做好吃
探索豬頭肉是我們日常飲食上比較常見的熟食,豬頭肉其中含有大量的營養元素以及大量的蛋白質和脂肪等,口感非常香,深受大眾的喜愛 ,而豬頭肉用來涼拌味道也是非常好 ,可以當做下酒菜 ,也非常下飯 ,而且做法也很簡單 ,首 ...
【探索】
阅读更多