您现在的位置是:休閑 >>正文
【】
休閑3人已围观
简介Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round ...
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://new.maomao321.com/news/55c7599869.html
相关文章
Early Apple
休閑One of the first Apple computers ever made is currently up for auction.A rare "Celebration" Apple-1 ...
【休閑】
阅读更多How to support the fight for equal pay
休閑It's 2020. 3D printers can make prosthetic limbs. Our computers can predict what we're going to type ...
【休閑】
阅读更多iFixit teardown confirms the iPhone 12 and 12 Pro are mostly identical
休閑Following a livestream on its YouTube channel on Friday, iFixit published a full in-depth breakdown ...
【休閑】
阅读更多
热门文章
- Nancy Pelosi warns colleagues after info hacked
- HBO Max's 'Locked Down' starring Anne Hathaway: Movie review
- Late night hosts do grim rapid
- Discovery+ streaming service: Everything to know
- 'Rocket League' Championship Series Season 2 offers $250,000 prize pool
- Happily never after: Why more romantic comedies need to embrace 'ending up' alone
最新文章
Twitter grants everyone access to quality filter for tweet notifications
How cosmetic glitter improved my self
Everything coming to Hulu in December 2020
Facebook's algorithm has systemic problems, asserts Congress
Major earthquake and multiple aftershocks rock central Italy
Photo apps show you are your own best social media