您现在的位置是:知識 >>正文
【】
知識737人已围观
简介On Sunday, Donald Trump tweeted.Most of the time, the president's tweets are occasions for any day e ...
On Sunday, Donald Trump tweeted.
Most of the time, the president's tweets are occasions for any day ending with the letter "y." But Sunday's missive was particularly notable for what he said. Or didn't say. Honestly, it was kind of confusing.
SEE ALSO:After Annapolis newsroom shooting, focus turns to Trump's media bashingTrump's tweet revealed the fact that he'd recently met with New York Timespublisher A.G. Sulzberger at the White House. Their discussion apparently focused on the challenges facing journalism and journalists in 2018, but like much of what Trump tweets, the meaning is open to interpretation.
Read it for yourself:
Tweet may have been deleted
"Spent much time talking about the vast amounts of Fake News being put out by the media & how that Fake News has morphed into the phrase, 'Enemy of the People,'" Trump wrote, concluding the note with one of his presidential trademarks: "Sad!"
Is he saying it's a bad thing that "Fake News" media has become synonymous with the phrase "Enemy of the People"? Does he not realize he's almost entirely responsible for both of those terms being applied to mainstream media? No one expects Trump to actually own some bad thing that he's done, but it's not at all clear what's "Sad!" here.
Sulzberger himself swooped in a short time later with some clarity. Just a few hours after the president's tweet surfaced, the New York Timesissued a statement explaining what the White House meeting was about -- it was originally an off-the-record chat, but Trump's public mention of it prompted the NYT's corroborating response -- and offering some insight into what Trump might have been saying.
Tweet may have been deleted
Here's Sulzberger's full statement on the July 20 meeting, where he was joined by the TimesEditorial Page editor, James Bennet:
My main purpose for accepting the meeting was to raise concerns about the president’s deeply troubling anti-press rhetoric.I told the president directly that I thought that his language was not just divisive but increasingly dangerous.I told him that although the phrase “fake news” is untrue and harmful, I am far more concerned about his labeling journalists “the enemy of the people.” I warned that this inflammatory language is contributing to a rise in threats against journalists and will lead to violence.I repeatedly stressed that this is particularly true abroad, where the president’s rhetoric is being used by some regimes to justify sweeping crackdowns on journalists. I warned that it was putting lives at risk, that it was undermining the democratic ideals of our nation, and that it was eroding one of our country’s greatest exports: a commitment to free speech and a free press.Throughout the conversation I emphasized that if President Trump, like previous presidents, was upset with coverage of his administration he was of course free to tell the world. I made clear repeatedly that I was not asking for him to soften his attacks on The Times if he felt our coverage was unfair. Instead, I implored him to reconsider his broader attacks on journalism, which I believe are dangerous and harmful to our country.
Given this additional context, it seems at least possible that Trump's tweet might be agreeing with Sulzberger's point (also made by plentyof others), that the "enemy of the people" rhetoric fosters a dangerous environment for those who work in the media. Don't take my word for it; just look at what happened with the Capital Gazette.
Wherever you fall on the political spectrum, I hope we can all agree that people being murdered just for doing their jobs is a bad thing. Dropping the "enemy of the people" rhetoric wouldn't magically fix things overnight -- damage has been done already -- but at least it would be a start.
Then again, maybe not.
Trump returned to Twitter on Sunday afternoon with an anti-media diatribe. While he didn't explicitly call the press "the enemy of the people," he did say that reporting on the "internal deliberations of our government" is "unpatriotic" and "puts the lives of many ... at risk."
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
The obvious counterpoint, of course, is that all the insider, anonymously-sourced reporting wouldn't be necessary if this dishonest administration and the political party that enables it dealt with the American people honestly and openly.
UPDATEDJuly 29, 2018 4:14 p.m. ET with Trump's afternoon tweets.
Featured Video For You
Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No. It's an inflatable Trump baby flying around London
TopicsDonald TrumpPolitics
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://new.maomao321.com/news/88a3199880.html
相关文章
Twitter grants everyone access to quality filter for tweet notifications
知識Twitter introduced two features Thursday in an effort to give users more control on what notificatio ...
【知識】
阅读更多Everything AI allows you to do in Windows 11 that saves you time
知識AI is becoming a major part of our digital lives, and Microsoft has adopted the new tech with open a ...
【知識】
阅读更多簡單係牛油曲奇的做法
知識我們經常說的一句話就是病從口入 ,確實也是。很多疾病就是這樣的 ,我們平時飲食的不注意,所以我們不能老在外麵吃飯,可以自己做飯哦 ,下麵小編就介紹簡單係牛油曲奇1.老實招了 ,這張圖片一直到擠花紋的那張中間的 ...
【知識】
阅读更多